Timbuktou:


1. Actually, my points are laid bare. You're the one who's been dancing around them Atilogwu-style.

2. Ok, only physical standards? Or there are no women who would do better than some men? I think you should be saying standards should not be lowered. Simple.

3. Aww. How cute, yet you support the structure that brings such things to fruition. I doubt you've ever paid any money to a lawyer to debate triviality because a womyn is having hormonal imbalances. Do you think a businessman or employer would pay $270k for employment consultancy because he just feels like it? That money could have gone into growing that business or just saving it for the rainy day. Anyway, moving on.

4. Tell that to Wax's employer who was faced with a government-sanctioned, feminism-inspired litigation if Wax so felt. Ah, this is getting boring.

5. In those fields, women not being employed was precisely because they did not qualify for those jobs. End of story. Nobody is targeting anybody. If anything employers are looking for people to help them achieve the goals of their organisation. Whether they are men or women is totally irrelevant.


By the way: have this for your condition. It's not easy to shout on the internet. It takes a lot to press that caps lock. Thank me later

PS: couldn't find water. Use your spit.

MrsChima:
Lord Reed, your buttermilk cornbread is ready boo.

freecocoa:
INo, can you provide me with a link, please?

MrsChima:

You mentioned what they were testing?

The grueling test requires potential recruits to climb six flights of stairs in full gear and drag dummies through tunnels with little visibility, among other tasks, and it’s to be completed in under 18 minutes, according to the Post.

pickabeau1:


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/06/chicago-women-firefighter_n_3225153.html

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2011-08-17/news/ct-met-female-firefighter-test-20110817_1_chicago-firefighters-physical-abilities-test-firefighter-exams





I guess you are feigning ignorance of what discussed
The test comprises a written n a physical
The written was passed by the lady
The physical test is as follows..

MrsChima:


What else do you want me to say other than what I said about your multiple "quota" questions and assertions?

2. Since you implied that only lazy and incompetent women are being employed because of "feminism" and fear of legal implications...those lazy and incompetent women in top positions have made Donald Trump billions of dollars.

If it wasn't for affirmative actions...Black/African men wouldn't have a chance next to white and Asian men.

Yes...Black and African men are discriminated every day...who is fighting for tour likes?

Nonso23:


Decaying
Reading conspiracy theories
I can't be disturbed if you choose to be ignorant. I mean it only further lends credence to my initial assertion.

MrsChima:


And i am feigning like a bleeding female bish.

pickabeau1:


Smh

Nonso23:


Why should i take the words of a person who pronounced herself 'ignorant' serious

LordReed:


Even when I agree with you still want to bite my head off. I think I have clarified my position if you want to argue with yourself feel free.

Nonso23:


How come you didn't recognise mine too or is it because you are really ignorant

Because it is the hard truth people are unwilling to swallow

Nonso23:


Oh you can't possibly not want her to graduate.
She is a woman and should be treated with kid gloves and resources wasted on her incompetence.
Iranu!

Nonso23:


What do you expect?
Women pleasers are on the increase everyday. Wasting money is the very least they could do. Overturning the entire recruitment process is more like it.
And someone somewhere thinks i will take a reta.rded movement seriously.
If we didn't get to to the top of the evolutionary ladder by quota or entitlements from nature it is only fair that we follow the working blueprints as we advance as a race.

Want something? Earn It

Nonso23:


Oh you can't possibly not want her to graduate.
She is a woman and should be treated with kid gloves and resources wasted on her incompetence.
Iranu!

Nonso23:

If the tendency to be abused is similar - i dare say higher - compared to other methods then it should be scrapped and the more natural award based on merit installed in its place.


Quota ignores the requirements. If a requirement is ignored of what purpose is it to the entire system?
Are you by any means saying that being a woman is akin to being handicapped?
People with disabilities are in another world of their own and if i were to be blunt i would say yes! if their disabilities hamper their performance then there's little to be done in that regard. Merit should be encouraged not mediocrity.



That more than thousands of years of portfolio building rubbished by a single simple word such as generalization.
It is indeed a track record.

Appeal to pity huh?
Is my nationality and the fraud tag going to stand in the way of my performance?
If they believe it to be so then a more stringent method of scrutiny can be applied to my situation. Nobody will kick you out for being a woman if you aced the final interview. Any thing contrary to that is a white lie. Like I said it will be difficult but it is still fair.
There are tests that are in place in recruitment exercises and everyone should be made to go through them with similar benchmarks set. If your history impedes your success it is only logical that you up your ante. Yes it would get tougher than others but at the end you are vindicated. Prove your mettle and no one will 'discriminate' against you.

freecocoa:
Thank you pickabeau for the links, I'll check them out.

pickabeau1:


Let me know what you think

MrsChima:


When one is trying too hard to convince others to accept their point of view even if it is illogical and full of nonsense....

I want to test your physical strength.....can you come move my bed and armiore?