FxMasterz:

Physical reality is different from spiritually reality. I have spiritual reality as well as physical reality. You have none.

The problem with 'spiritual' reality, is everyone has their own version, its not universal. Put 3 christians in a room and ask them about a particular 'spiritual' reality and you'll have 4 versions. So no, I won't believe your 'spiritual' reality, thank you.
I'll stick with the physical reality which is universal, transparent, irrefutable etc.
Like a black car. Its a black car in Nigeria and UK, and would remain a black car in 10 years

jaephoenix:

The years is what is used to date floods

Are you minding the hypocrite. He was the first to mention that it was dated to 5000BCE

FxMasterz:


They agreed that a catastrophic event must have happened with the dating of that event going back to about 5,000 BC which is about the same time as the flood of Noah according to the article.

That's further buttresses by the the opinion that says the witnesses of that catastrophic event must have passed down the story to their descendants.

but now that he can see that the fact demolishes his argument suddenly it is irrelevant. Bwahahahahaha!

LordReed:


Are you minding the hypocrite. He was the first to mention that it was dated to 5000BCE



but now that he can see that the fact demolishes his argument suddenly it is irrelevant. Bwahahahahaha!

If we want to start talking about dates, that's a different topic entirely. The current discussion is not in your favour so you shifted the goalpost to date anomalies. Meanwhile, you and I know that no one can be perfectly correct about dates. We can only approximate and yet in the approximations, there's never a guarantee.

I don't want to engage in fruitless arguments just for the sake of it. It's just another way of wasting time with folks who are totally sold out to their own biases. I have better things to do with my time. I'll rather engage in things that edify my spirit than waste time on useless arguments to no profit. It wouldn't end, it's endless argument.

The more you write, the more I counteract you and vice versa. So, I'll just ignore. We can argue on other topics later on. I'll stop wheh I have already driven home my points. I've done that here already, so bye, except you want to be arguing with yourself.

FxMasterz:

If we want to start talking about dates, that's a different topic entirely. The current discussion is not in your favour so you shifted the goalpost to date anomalies. Meanwhile, you and I know that no one can be perfectly correct about dates. We can only approximate and yet in the approximations, there's never a guarantee.

I don't want to engage in fruitless arguments just for the sake of it. It's just another way of wasting time with folks who are totally sold out to their own biases. I have better things to do with my time. I'll rather engage in things that edify my spirit than waste time on useless arguments to no profit. It wouldn't end, it's endless argument.

The more you write, the more I counteract you and vice versa. So, I'll just ignore. We can argue on other topics later on. I'll stop wheh I have already driven home my points. I've done that here already, so bye, except you want to be arguing with yourself.

Translation
I give up, these facts are getting too much for me.


Anyway, have a nice day. Next time you wanna argue with atheists, try and be properly prepared, else you'll be eaten alive. Ciao

FxMasterz:

If we want to start talking about dates, that's a different topic entirely. The current discussion is not in your favour so you shifted the goalpost to date anomalies. Meanwhile, you and I know that no one can be perfectly correct about dates. We can only approximate and yet in the approximations, there's never a guarantee.

I don't want to engage in fruitless arguments just for the sake of it. It's just another way of wasting time with folks who are totally sold out to their own biases. I have better things to do with my time. I'll rather engage in things that edify my spirit than waste time on useless arguments to no profit. It wouldn't end, it's endless argument.

The more you write, the more I counteract you and vice versa. So, I'll just ignore. We can argue on other topics later on. I'll stop wheh I have already driven home my points. I've done that here already, so bye, except you want to be arguing with yourself.

Bwahahahahaha! Keep faking yourself. You were the one who brought up the date not me so how is it me who is deflecting? Meanwhile you counteracted nothing, you flailed about like a headless chicken. LoLz.

Bye to you too. Make sure you register it well in your brain that you can't fake your way through discussions about facts.

jaephoenix:

Translation
I give up, these facts are getting too much for me.


Anyway, have a nice day. Next time you wanna argue with atheists, try and be properly prepared, else you'll be eaten alive. Ciao

Eaten alive? Honestly, I don't consider your arguments intelligent enough. Go through the threads and read objectively. It's very easy to see how biased and half-baked your argunehts are.

Have a nice day too bro.

FxMasterz:

Eaten alive? Honestly, I don't consider your arguments intelligent enough. Go through the threads and read objectively. It's very easy to see how biased and half-baked your argunehts are.

Have a nice day too bro.

Half baked? Throughout this thread you never provided any fact to back your claim. You posted 2 links( intending to prove Moses and the flood were real) and they turned out to be your downfall, you were roasted with data from those links. There are many links backing my claims, and I dropped them here, you couldn't debunk any.
So yeah, you have a long way to go

FxMasterz:

There's a general opinion that God exists. You're one of the negligible few who have a contrary opinion. The onus lies on you to prove to us that we are wrong.

You have committed at least 4 fallacies with this post. When you said general opinion god exists, what god are you referring to? Remember about 6000 years ago people were worshipping trees, rocks etc as god. Do they qualify too? And yet they can't prove such rocks have powers, just like you can't prove yours.
And again, he who alleges must prove

jaephoenix:

You have committed at least 4 fallacies with this post. When you said general opinion god exists, what god are you referring to? Remember about 6000 years ago people were worshipping trees, rocks etc as god. Do they qualify too? And yet they can't prove such rocks have powers, just like you can't prove yours.
And again, he who alleges must prove

Those who would be damned would be damned. There's no need to clarify issues to someone who is obstinately clinging to perdition.

FxMasterz:

Those who would be damned would be damned. There's no need to clarify issues to someone who is obstinately clinging to perdition.

Translation
These damned atheists are just too smart for me

jaephoenix:

Translation
These damned atheists are just too smart for me

Wrong!

FxMasterz:

Wrong!

Well, you've done nothing to prove us wrong, bro

jaephoenix:

Well, you've done nothing to prove us wrong, bro

That's because you don't want to accept you're wrong. Neither have you done anything to prove me wrong as well.

What I know is that you guys have deliberately chosen perdition to yourselves. It's a pity that you would drag your innocent children into your errors. I'll leave you to your fate.

FxMasterz:

That's because you don't want to accept you're wrong. Neither have you done anything to prove me wrong as well.

What I know is that you guys have deliberately chosen perdition to yourselves. It's a pity that you would drag your innocent children into your errors. I'll leave you to your fate.

Ok bro. Thanks for your concern.

FxMasterz:

That's because you don't want to accept you're wrong. Neither have you done anything to prove me wrong as well.

What I know is that you guys have deliberately chosen perdition to yourselves. It's a pity that you would drag your innocent children into your errors. I'll leave you to your fate.

We proved you wrong so many ways you are now going on emotional appeals. LoLz.

LordReed:


We proved you wrong so many ways you are now going on emotional appeals. LoLz.

No you never did. I was the one who proved you wrong so many ways. Go back and read.

FxMasterz:

No you never did. I was the one who proved you wrong so many ways. Go back and read.

LoLz. Not even once. You were wrong about the very premise of the thread, that the remains of Sodom and Gomorrah had been found. Not only are you wrong you failed to provide evidence of any sort of divine action so you are actually a double loser.

LordReed:


We proved you wrong so many ways you are now going on emotional appeals. LoLz.

He left factual appeal and has finally landed where many christian lands when defeated: emotional appeals. Same tool my family always try to use when I show them glaring discrepancies in their religion. Its an amusing thing cos people that are otherwise intelligent would play this card and you wonder, "What has religion done to his brain?"

FxMasterz:

No you never did. I was the one who proved you wrong so many ways. Go back and read.

Lol. Where? The Moses case, you lost. Same as the flood. Each of the links you presented further buttressed the facts they didn't exist. In fact your last link clearly stated that the flood was a local event, but they wanted to sensationalize the news, and sucked you in to their ploy

jaephoenix:

He left factual appeal and has finally landed where many christian lands when defeated: emotional appeals. Same tool my family always try to use when I show them glaring discrepancies in their religion. Its an amusing thing cos people that are otherwise intelligent would play this card and you wonder, "What has religion done to his brain?"

The more jarring ones are the ones that pretend they have scientific evidence which when probed turns into an utter pile of bullshit. Their turn towards emotional appeals is so comical.

LordReed:


The more jarring ones are the ones that pretend they have scientific evidence which when probed turns into an utter pile of bullshit. Their turn towards emotional appeals is so comical.

There's this TenQ character I'm arguing with, he's using logic and science to prove Yahweh existence, and doing a poor job of it, using special pleading fallacies and poor application of science

jaephoenix:

There's this TenQ character I'm arguing with, he's using logic and science to prove Yahweh existence, and doing a poor job of it, using special pleading fallacies and poor application of science

He reminds me of myself when I was still a Christian but he avoids being honest with himself.

LordReed:


He reminds me of myself when I was still a Christian but he avoids being honest with himself.

It's myopic of you to always imagine that honesty is agreeing with your ignorance.

jaephoenix:

There's this TenQ character I'm arguing with, he's using logic and science to prove Yahweh existence, and doing a poor job of it, using special pleading fallacies and poor application of science

Who decides who does a poor job of using science and logic? YOU!?

If your science had been just a little up it would have been good for you. Your inability to comprehend simple logic with elementary science is at best appalling.
It would have even been better if you were just a little more sincere and honest with the implication of deductions you'd have found yourself in only that you will AVOID implicating consequences of answering a direct questions while you cherry pick what to respond to.

Is LordReed your mentor and pastor in the religion of atheism?
SMH!

When you are ready to respond honestly to questions, call me!
Shior!!

TenQ:

Who decides who does a poor job of using science and logic? YOU!?

If your science had been just a little up it would have been good for you. Your inability to comprehend simple logic with elementary science is at best appalling.
It would have even been better if you were just a little more sincere and honest with the implication of deductions you'd have found yourself in only that you will AVOID implicating consequences of answering a direct questions while you cherry pick what to respond to.

Is LordReed your mentor and pastor in the religion of atheism?
SMH!

When you are ready to respond honestly to questions, call me!
Shior!!

You x-rayed them bro. They'll be cherry picking responses, read biased interpretations into references and take sentences out of context when they're face to face with facts. Afterwards, they'll be claiming smartness based on falsehood. You'll see that in their arguments with fxmasterz here. They're never sincere with themselves. Very dishonest Atheists.

TenQ:

Who decides who does a poor job of using science and logic? YOU!?

If your science had been just a little up it would have been good for you. Your inability to comprehend simple logic with elementary science is at best appalling.
It would have even been better if you were just a little more sincere and honest with the implication of deductions you'd have found yourself in only that you will AVOID implicating consequences of answering a direct questions while you cherry pick what to respond to.

Is LordReed your mentor and pastor in the religion of atheism?
SMH!

When you are ready to respond honestly to questions, call me!
Shior!!

It may sound stupid to you theists, but atheism isn’t based on mentorship or appealing to authority. Everyone is born with a brain. Develop and use it to analyze the world around you.
Back to your post content, I kept on asking you to provide evidence of your Yahweh existence and you keep pushing me to science, which you have a poor grasp.
You even said all the gods in the world is Yahweh, displaying your desperation for acceptance

Rosemaiden:

You x-rayed them bro. They'll be cherry picking responses, read biased interpretations into references and take sentences out of context when they're face to face with facts. Afterwards, they'll be claiming smartness based on falsehood. You'll see that in their arguments with fxmasterz here. They're never sincere with themselves. Very dishonest Atheists.

See this one
Like your theist friend, you cannot provide a simple evidence of any Bible event. Instead you keep on dropping half assed links that ultimately prove you wrong

jaephoenix:

See this one
Like your theist friend, you cannot provide a simple evidence of any Bible event. Instead you keep on dropping half assed links that ultimately prove you wrong

Where are they links I dropped? Did my post hit you this hard?

Rosemaiden:

You x-rayed them bro. They'll be cherry picking responses, read biased interpretations into references and take sentences out of context when they're face to face with facts. Afterwards, they'll be claiming smartness based on falsehood. You'll see that in their arguments with fxmasterz here. They're never sincere with themselves. Very dishonest Atheists.

Empty barrels they say make the loudest noise. They want to peddle a rhetoric of a Christian proving the existence of God while they dodge any attempt to make them prove the contrary.

A true atheist is one who either
1. Consciously reject God
2. Has enough evidence to conclude that God doesn't exist.

The first is possible but the second is impossible for it assumes you have extraordinary complete knowledge of the Universe.
3. Agnostics are at best Jokers!

TenQ:

Empty barrels they say make the loudest noise. They want to peddle a rhetoric of a Christian proving the existence of God while they dodge any attempt to make them prove the contrary.

A true atheist is one who either
1. Consciously reject God
2. Has enough evidence to conclude that God doesn't exist.

The first is possible but the second is impossible for it assumes you have extraordinary complete knowledge of the Universe.
3. Agnostics are at best Jokers!

You said it all.

Rosemaiden:

Where are they links I dropped? Did my post hit you this hard?

Sorry, I thought u were the guy we were chatting with about the Bible. Apologies

TenQ:

Empty barrels they say make the loudest noise. They want to peddle a rhetoric of a Christian proving the existence of God while they dodge any attempt to make them prove the contrary.

A true atheist is one who either
1. Consciously reject God
2. Has enough evidence to conclude that God doesn't exist.

The first is possible but the second is impossible for it assumes you have extraordinary complete knowledge of the Universe.
3. Agnostics are at best Jokers!

Answer this question.
Do you believe
1. I live in Mars and fly to Earth everyday for work?
2. Do you believe a black unicorns exist?