lawani:
Cheating is not the same thing as polygamy. Cheating is dishonesty. Both men and women cheat but men do it more.

the issue IS.... majority of these so called POLYGAMOUS men are just low life men who cant be honest to their women about who they really are, and therefore they simply use the "POLYGAMOUS IN NATURE" nonsense to answer for their cheating ways (AFTER they get caught)....and its never about proud men who face their women and openly tell them to their face (when they 1st meet):"hey i am a polygamous man and you will be one of the many women in my life"

a polygamous man has no problem telling a woman he just met that this is who he is
a cheating man is a coward afraid of his woman, who crawl at the dead of night to go cheat, while pretending to be a one woman man.

1Sharon:


Polygamy isn't sleeping with multiple women while being in a relationship.

Polygamy is marrying more than one woman!

How do you define "marrying"? In some religions/societies you are married to a woman if you are having sex with her.
We are NOT discussing polygamy. We are discussing POLYGAMOUS by nature - tendency towards more than one sex-mate if there were no constraints whatsoever

DaddyCoool:



How do you define "marrying"? In some religions/societies you are married to a woman if you are having sex with her.
We are NOT discussing polygamy. We are discussing POLYGAMOUS by nature - tendency towards more than one sex-mate if there were no constraints whatsoever

Don't try and use semantics to win an argument. We all know what marriage is.

Polygamous means related to polygamy and its the adjective of polygamy.

Polygamy means marriage to more than one woman. No pluses or subtractions.

The term you are looking for is promiscuity and not polygamy.

Go and marry more than one woman first and come back and talk about how "polygamous by nature" you are.

1Sharon:


Don't try and use semantics to win an argument. We all know what marriage is.

Polygamous means related to polygamy and its the adjective of polygamy.

Polygamy means marriage to more than one woman. No pluses or subtractions.

The term you are looking for is promiscuity and not polygamy.

Go and marry more than one woman first and come back and talk about how "polygamous by nature" you are.

You are woefully wrong. A moslem told me that in Islam you can't have sex with a woman you are not married to but it was perfectly ok to marry her just before the act and divorce her afterwards.
You are also wrong - polygamy in the sense we are using it on this thread is tendency to want to bed more than one woman - and photos are posted to buttress that fact!

DaddyCoool:


You are woefully wrong. A moslem told me that in Islam you can't have sex with a woman you are not married to but it was perfectly ok to marry her just before the act and divorce her afterwards.
You are also wrong - polygamy in the sense we are using it on this thread is tendency to want to bed more than one woman - and photos are posted to buttress that fact!

Well are you a Muslim?


Well that is promiscuity and not polygamy, also wrong.


Why do you guys always claim polygamy after cheating? Why aren't you upfront from the beginning? You'd actually get more respect for being truthful.

lekjons:
I think the nature/behavior of women throughout history validates the assertion(that men are polygamous in nature) more than anything men did/does.

For instance, a lot women would marry or become a baby mama for a known married man if he meets certain standards, and will happily stay with him and continue to "love" him as long as he maintains status quo.

It's not quite the same for men as men are more territorial in that regard.

That is because only women can get pregnant but if it is about having sex with other people, there is not much difference between men and women

1Sharon:


Well are you a Muslim?


Well that is promiscuity and not polygamy, also wrong.


Why do you guys always claim polygamy after cheating? Why aren't you upfront from the beginning? You'd actually get more respect for being truthful.

That's not the discussion. The discussion is NOT wether polygamy is right or wrong.
The discussion is wether nature made men polygamous (remember, people did not make themselves!). Nature could have made it so once a man sleeps with a woman he'd only have eyes for her.
It did not!

DaddyCoool:


That's not the discussion. The discussion is NOT wether polygamy is right or wrong.
The discussion is wether nature made men polygamous (remember, people did not make themselves!). Nature could have made it so once a man sleeps with a woman he'd only have eyes for her.
It did not!

Follow the thread, when i said wrong it was in response to you and OP using polygamy in the wrong context.

Most men are not polygamous. If you are polygamous, go and marry more than one wife and come back and talk.

DaddyCoool:

So let's do a thought experiment.

1) Would a young lady still want to get married and be tied to just one man if she had a bunch of willing guys available for sex any time she wants?
Answer: a resounding YES!!!

.remember i mentioned brokeness and stinginess ...women dont like paying bills....nd thats one of their reason for being with and needing men.....give women tons of money so much that they wont need men to pay their bills and see them rubbish and kick men out of their life.....

DaddyCoool:

2) Would a young man still want to get married and be tied to just one girl if he had a harem of girls available for sex any time he wants?
Answer: a resounding NO!!

This is fallacy......look around u.....men are getting married every saturday when they could be with plenty women...
.take it or leave it...society standards influences everyone at some point...the need to have kids, the nees to be safe, etc......my cousin that works with exxon got married few weeks back. With all his monthly earnings, nigga could afford plenty women..but still got married

DaddyCoool:

There is no biological nor evolutionary advantage to girl to have a bunch if guys using her "thing"!

Biological...?? Evolutionary..?? Lol...u are funny.....For starters...one of the basic need for evolution is survival....and women will gladly spread their legs every to survive...abi u nor dey see tht one too around you....and i m not talkimg about prostituteś..

Going with the biology u mentiined...sex is pleasure to the body and mind...and its naturally addictive becos we have hormones and our brain have receptors that keeps triggering us with the urge, weda u are a man or women....
So take or leave it....humans love variety of everything...especially fun & pleasure ......its our nature....unless we train our brain/nature which is where discipline comes in.... without discipline men and women are practically the same... driven by impulses, desire, and survival

They just choose to be irresponsible

advanceDNA:


●.remember i mentioned brokeness and stinginess ...women dont like paying bills....nd thats one of their reason for being with and needing men.....give women tons of money so much that they wont need men to pay their bills and see them rubbish and kick men out of their life.....



■This is fallacy......look around u.....men are getting married every saturday when they could be with plenty women...
.take it or leave it...society standards influences everyone at some point...the need to have kids, the nees to be safe, etc......my cousin that works with exxon got married few weeks back. With all his monthly earnings, nigga could afford plenty women..but still got married



■■Biological...?? Evolutionary..?? Lol...u are funny.....For starters...one of the basic need for evolution is survival....and women will gladly spread their legs every to survive...abi u nor dey see tht one too around you....and i m not talkimg about prostituteś..

Going with the biology u mentiined...sex is pleasure to the body and mind...and its naturally addictive becos we have hormones and our brain have receptors that keeps triggering us with the urge, weda u are a man or women....
●●So take or leave it....humans love variety of everything...especially fun & pleasure ......its our nature....unless we train our brain/nature which is where discipline comes in.... without discipline men and women are practically the same... driven by impulses, desire, and survival

You are TOTALLY wrong on all counts:
● The discussion is how they are NATURALLY wired, NOT what they would do under lack or need. Women who won the lottery or inherited large sums don't keep a harem of boys unlike men

■ And men are also having side chicks everyday. Questin is, if there were no constraints would most men choose to be with only one woman?
Notice how "side chick" isa popular term and there is no such popular term vis â vis women. High achieveming men sleeping around is what actually prompted the thread

■■ A woman conceives once every TWO YEARS or so, while a man can impregnate several women in ONE DAY!! A man guarantees some of his genes would survive by putting it in several women, not just one.
A woman is by taking good care of the few she has, giving them good genes by sleeping with successful men, and getting a man to stay with her exclusively and take care of them with her! Nature also uses that scenario to ensure the best genes are pass on to the next generation.

●● Vast majority women don't want variety of sex partners. They want ONE man exclusiv

In my opinion, humans are created without religion or culture. That's why we have several religions and cultures in the world. Suffice it to say therefore that a man by nature is polygamous. There's what you called self discipline that some men and women possessed. It's this self discipline that restrained man or woman from committing crimes of all callings. There's difference between nature and discipline.

DaddyCoool:


You are TOTALLY wrong on all counts:
● The discussion is how they are NATURALLY wired, NOT what they would do under lack or need. Women who won the lottery or inherited large sums don't keep a harem of boys unlike men

■ And men are also having side chicks everyday. Questin is, if there were no constraints would most men choose to be with only one woman?
Notice how "side chick" isa popular term and there is no such popular term vis â vis women. High achieveming men sleeping around is what actually prompted the thread

■■ A woman conceives once every TWO YEARS or so, while a man can impregnate several women in ONE DAY!! A man guarantees some of his genes would survive by putting it in several women, not just one.
A woman is by taking good care of the few she has, giving them good genes by sleeping with successful men, and getting a man to stay with her exclusively and take care of them with her! Nature also uses that scenario to ensure the best genes are pass on to the next generation.

●● Vast majority women don't want variety of sex partners. They want ONE man exclusiv

I am wrong?? because?? U are one of those pple that dialogue like u are out to win a non-existent trophy...........Guy.....u brought evolution into the topic..but u dont want to bring in what a specie/organism will do under need and pressure...?? How an organism behaves is partly based nature's wiring and mostly environmental factor.....but somehow u want to tell me how women will behave without considering existing environmental realities.. okay oooo

Mayb uve not thought about it....societal standards that slut shame women is what makes lots of women not behave like a slut.......... its what make women not approach men..... u think women dont want to fvck when they see cute men?? So all these young women with multiple guys are what?? Bingo??

Oga u know know wetin you dey talk....there is hardly a man that doesnt have a story of catching his babe with another man multiple time especially babes of age 18-28.....

Women only opt for one male...when they want to get older and want to marry because society demands it so ......its the same society
Standards that make men want to marry too even though can run around with plenty females for life....
men are not sexually different from women.... u are just choosing to see what u like...

khadaffi:


Secondly, talking based on purely science here, no religion. There is a scientific reason nature made man to be polygamous. If you study the way the chimpanzee lives in the wild, it is closely related to how humans also existed before the technology started taking over. Humans were designed to be social animals that live in groups of not more than 50 people. It is technology that made it possible to exceed this number. So what happens when we exceed this number? War. If you look at the chimpanzee, you will see how a clan go to war with another clan. In a war situation, the men are expendable and the female is the most important gender that can easily repopulate the clan. For this reason females don't go to war. They are to be protected at all cost. If in any event war gets to the females and they had to start defending themselves then that is the end of that clan. Even if there are fewer men left after battle, the females will quickly repopulate the clan in order for them to withstand the next onslaught by any clan.

Interesting update about the lives of lower primates. To add, the major scientific reason is testosterone. The hormone makes a man produce millions of sperm cells daily. The most enjoyable and effective means of dispensing these cells is via sexual intercourse. So, biologically, a man is not supposed to have sex with only one woman for the rest of his life. In Davido's case, vasectomy solves the issue.

Mindlog:
Ask men to choose between marrying 3 wives and marrying one wife, with 2 side chicks.

Being polygamous is not restricted to males as we do have women who sleep with many men at the same period of time and are emotionally detached from those men, just that they are smarter enough to get money out of it as against some men who are very willing to offer free sex.

If women cheat for money then men cheat for what reason exactly?

Married women are the new side chicken destroying marriages if you don't know. Humans are insatiable and selfish creatures.
People who chose to be faithful and not polygamous do so by their choice and self control not cos there is one design somewhere making them not to. Men and women alike can be polyamorous, just that the society and religion allows men to be free with their lack of self control and even praise it they don't have to hide it like some women do

HRprof:
■ If women cheat for money then men cheat for what reason exactly?

They don't cheat for money. Rather the money is the additional benefit they obtain from their sideguys

DaddyCoool:


Biologically, a woman's vagina gets aclamted to a given man's sperm. Familiarity is what turns women on - hence the phenomenon of craving their ex

Sounds good, but I doubt d part u said sperm.
I can agree wit Okafor's Law. @congo dynamism..

Kayceenaz:
Whenever news filters in online/offline about a man either alleged or proved to have cheated on his wife, abundant outbursts follow. Often, "Men are polygamous in nature" is argued. It is believed recognizing this reality by the man's wife and other women (single/married) prepares them to accept cheating, ridding the matter of seriousness critics give. I disagree. Men are neither polygamous (nor monogamous) in nature.

First, a man's polygamous tendencies are from nurture, not nature. This habit of justifying marital unfaithfulness, in the Christian context, by citing African culture is misplaced. Here, African men in the remote past chose to be with or marry more than one woman for social and economic reasons. To highlight their affluence to society and have more hands to help in their farming/subsistent agriculture venture. A husband who cheats on his wife makes a choice to succumb to temptation. If polygamy is actually natural to men, then we would have no cases of monogamous men.

Second, every man contains reason and instincts according to neurology and biology. Reason is a human being's edge over lower animals like dogs, goats, sheep, lions and so on, although we share trait of instincts with them. Someone may argue our bodily instincts, a biological feature passed from parents to offspring, push us toward pleasure and preservation of the human specie. This can extend to being with more than one woman, hence men are polygamous. This view is myopic. True, our instincts can suggest such but our reason can say no when we've intentionally developed it to morally serve us that way. Thus, a man chooses to be polygamous when he develops his reason to serve him accordingly. Humans, men are not the at the mercy of their instincts, as promoters of "Men are polygamous in nature" opine. A man can choose to obey or disobey his instincts courtesy of his reason.

Clearly, idea of "Men are polygamous in nature" is used by men who have a women weakness, refuse to take personal responsibility and work on it. They hide under culture and science unintelligently to secure tolerance of their bad behaviour (in Christian view) by women and society.


©Kelechi O. Naze (KON)

Thanks for such thought-provoking and timely discourse.
Permit me to answer using Scriptures.

1. There are 2 categories of people; The saved and the unsaved. One who has encountered Christ and one who hasn't but simply religious or anti-religion.

2. Every man who has not encountered Christ is a victim of the curse of the fallen Adam. Struggling to survive and Lack of self control. Unless he finds Grace.

Gen.3.17 - Then to Adam He said, "Because you have heeded the voice of your wife, and have eaten from the tree of which I commanded you, saying, "You shall not eat of it': "Cursed is the ground for your sake; In toil you shall eat of it All the days of your life.

3. The fallen woman is bound to love and cling to a man even to her destruction. She can't control it because she also suffers lack of self-control. It is the curse on Eve. Unless she finds Grace.

Gen.3.16 - To the woman He said: "I will greatly multiply your sorrow and your conception; In pain you shall bring forth children; Your desire shall be for your husband, And he shall rule over you."

The fallen Adam however is bound to be polygamous in nature because any successful man will be clinged by women. It is the way the curse operates.

Isa.4.1 - And in that day seven women shall take hold of one man, saying, "We will eat our own food and wear our own apparel; Only let us be called by your name, To take away our reproach."

5. It is the saved man and woman who have encountered both the saving Grace and the transformative Grace of Christ that can have the Power to break the curse and live a blessed and fruitful monogamous marriage.
Monogamy is not a yardstick that one has broken the curse. A peaceful home is the yardstick and it is Love and Submission that accomplishes this.

It is only in Christ that every curse is fully broken.
May God grant us blessed marriages and peaceful homes.

May God also in his mercy help repair and restore marriages of his children in Jesus name because He will build his homes/church and the gates of hell shall not prevail against them.
And even the legal captives will be set free, says the LORD. Amen.

My answer is YES!!!

Before you crucify, I won't justify the actions of cheating on your spouse when you can actually marry second wife and still counting 🤣...

Men are polygamous in nature since the days of our fore Father's and their purposes were for more work force on their farmland through the use their offspring but due to jealousy and hatreds amongst mothers, that's why some mothers are not always happy with the success of their rivals children.. if this end point justifies that it is wrong to marry more wives, don't forget that siblings from the same mother still hates on each other.

When the Europeans also came to Africa, bringing a system of marriage to one wife, we also tried to embrace, neglecting our old ways of marrying more than one wife but forgetting that European way of polygamy is seen in their divorce....
That's where the use of Step Father, Step Mother and Step Children as English came to be.
With this few points of mine, I think I am able to convince you not to confuse you that we men are polygamous in nature 🤪[b][/b]

DaddyCoool:


Well the discussion is what you'd be inclined if there were no constraints whatsoever. You could be an outlier but experience has shown that most men would tend towards polygamy

Well I don't know about men being polygamous.

Maybe it depends on family. I grew up in one of the worse ghettos in Nigeria, worse in a face me I face you. Sex is cheap and easy to get but I think the key to me being reserved is my father.

That man carried his family on his head like say tomorrow no dey.

Growing up, I always saw him shuttle between work and house, doesn't drink or keep late nights. I never saw them fight, they didn't even flog any of us till this age.

I am 31yrs and still do not know what being flogged by parents means because the highest we got was punishment (go sleep, go inside, kneel down, raise hand) na my brothers, neighbors and teachers dey flog us then.

You are free to go out but you must tell someone where you are going to and must Be back before 6pm.

Till today, anywhere I am going, I send my fiancee a live location on whatsapp, I also still return home latest 8pm.

It is the same with my elder siblings. None of us drink, smoke or even live wild lifestyle

lawani:


Cheating is not easy now. Very difficult and that is why many men save themselves the headache

Asin ehhh. It has always been stress for me from day one. Even with girls not seeking anything and willing to spend. I will have to quit a relationship for another. I don't combine both

advanceDNA:


I am wrong?? because?? U are one of those pple that dialogue like u are out to win a non-existent trophy...........Guy.....u brought evolution into the topic..but u dont want to bring in what a specie/organism will do under need and pressure...?? How an organism behaves is partly based nature's wiring and mostly environmental factor.....but somehow u want to tell me how women will behave without considering existing environmental realities.. okay oooo

Mayb uve not thought about it....societal standards that slut shame women is what makes lots of women not behave like a slut.......... its what make women not approach men..... u think women dont want to fvck when they see cute men?? So all these young women with multiple guys are what?? Bingo??

Oga u know know wetin you dey talk....there is hardly a man that doesnt have a story of catching his babe with another man multiple time especially babes of age 18-28.....

Women only opt for one male...when they want to get older and want to married because society demands it so ......its the same society
Standards that make men want to marry too even though can run around with plenty females for life....
men are not sexually different from women.... u are just choosing to see what u like...

This thread is about NATURAL wiring/inclination NOT circumstances.
You talk naively. You totally forget BIOLOGY!! Men and women are biologically very different, and unbeknownst to them most of their basic inclinations are from that biology! The most basic primal urge of a living organism is the need to survive and to have their genes survive and passed on. We didn't make it so, we don't know why it is so - we met it so! For a man the surest way to assure some of his genes survive and passed on is to spread his seeds into several women, not just one. On the other hand, a woman sleeping around has no such advantage. She can only conceive about once every two years no matter how many men she sleeps with! So her strategy to have some of her genes survive and passed on necessarily have to be very different!

DaddyCoool:


This thread is about NATURAL wiring/inclination NOT circumstances.
You talk naively. You totally forget BIOLOGY!! Men and women are biologically very different, and unbeknownst to them most of their basic inclinations are from that biology! The most basic primal urge of a living organism is the need to survive and to have their genes survive and passed on. We didn't make it so, we don't know why it is so - we met it so! For a man the surest way to assure some of his genes survive and passed on is to spread his seeds into several women, not just one. On the other hand, a woman sleeping around has no such advantage. She can only conceive about once every two years no matter how many men she sleeps with! So her strategy to have some of her genes survive and passed on necessarily have to be very different!

Yawn....i am tired

khadaffi:


Early men were never monogamous. I don't know where you get these fact from. Even a careful peep at the Bible that the OP based this post on clearly show the men in those days married more than one wife and it was also normal to have concubines. What we have today is a society that has been changed as a result of technology, civilisation etc. Even our other close relatives in the animal kingdom who are also primates e.g Orangutan, chimpanzee etc are not monogamous.I challenge anybody that thinks otherwise to name any primate apart from human that is monogamous. Monogamy is supported by the present day culture and economic reality (especially in a country like Nigeria with zero social security). I married only one wife so I'm not supporting polygamy but the truth have to be said. It takes a high level of discipline for someone on the status of Davido to be monogamous.

Secondly, talking based on purely science here, no religion. There is a scientific reason nature made man to be polygamous. If you study the way the chimpanzee lives in the wild, it is closely related to how humans also existed before the technology started taking over. Humans were designed to be social animals that live in groups of not more than 50 people. It is technology that made it possible to exceed this number. So what happens when we exceed this number? War. If you look at the chimpanzee, you will see how a clan go to war with another clan. In a war situation, the men are expendable and the female is the most important gender that can easily repopulate the clan. For this reason females don't go to war. They are to be protected at all cost. If in any event war gets to the females and they had to start defending themselves then that is the end of that clan. Even if there are fewer men left after battle, the females will quickly repopulate the clan in order for them to withstand the next onslaught by any clan.

In some ancient societies, brothers share wives when there is shortage of women. I have heard of a case in ancient Britain. However men die in war and women generally are war booty and if you have enough women in your clan, your next generation is assured. When men die in wars, you have excess women and you then need polygamy but the average man in most human society has always been monogamous. Harems were meant for Kings and big men. Nowadays war has reduced and what should be acceptable is monogamy

MySolace:

Sounds good, but I doubt d part u said sperm.
I can agree wit Okafor's Law. @congo dynamism..

advanceDNA:


Yawn....i am tired

See below
Nature punishes a woman for sleeping with a new partner - and rewards a man!

Anonymoususher:


Well I don't know about men being polygamous.

Maybe it depends on family. I grew up in one of the worse ghettos in Nigeria, worse in a face me I face you. Sex is cheap and easy to get but I think the key to me being reserved is my father.

That man carried his family on his head like say tomorrow no dey.

Growing up, I always saw him shuttle between work and house, doesn't drink or keep late nights. I never saw them fight, they didn't even flog any of us till this age.

I am 31yrs and still do not know what being flogged by parents means because the highest we got was punishment (go sleep, go inside, kneel down, raise hand) na my brothers, neighbors and teachers dey flog us then.

You are free to go out but you must tell someone where you are going to and must Be back before 6pm.

Till today, anywhere I am going, I send my fiancee a live location on whatsapp, I also still return home latest 8pm.

It is the same with my elder siblings. None of us drink, smoke or even live wild lifestyle

Congratulations. Very good. But we are talking men in general not just you. See above

DaddyCoool:




See below
Nature punishes a woman for sleeping with a new partner - and rewards a man!

How does this change the fact that men and women love sex and love variety...?? Dialogue with you is very weird... u dialogue like u want to win something....

advanceDNA:


I am wrong?? because?? U are one of those pple that dialogue like u are out to win a non-existent trophy...........Guy.....u brought evolution into the topic..but u dont want to bring in what a specie/organism will do under need and pressure...?? How an organism behaves is partly based nature's wiring and mostly environmental factor.....but somehow u want to tell me how women will behave without considering existing environmental realities.. okay oooo

Mayb uve not thought about it....societal standards that slut shame women is what makes lots of women not behave like a slut.......... its what make women not approach men..... u think women dont want to fvck when they see cute men?? So all these young women with multiple guys are what?? Bingo??

Oga u know know wetin you dey talk....there is hardly a man that doesnt have a story of catching his babe with another man multiple time especially babes of age 18-28.....

Women only opt for one male...when they want to get older and want to marry because society demands it so ......its the same society
Standards that make men want to marry too even though can run around with plenty females for life....
men are not sexually different from women.... u are just choosing to see what u like...

I'm sorry but Mr advanceDNA, you're very wrong on this subject.

There are core part of humans that whatever society they are, It will be constant. Hypergamy is one of them, regardless of the society, region and base, women will always want men who have more status, make more money, more wisdom or is powerful. Hence they always flock around those that fit this requirement. According to Nypost, Tiger Woods had 120 affairs, including one with young neighbor. Those women wouldn't even mind being the number 25 or 100 on the roaster, they all want him. Some of those women are regular people, cashiers and restaurant servers etc.

Reference: nypost.com/2010/04/29/tiger-woods-had-120-affairs-including-one-with-young-neighbor/

This has nothing to do with society! Men love Quatity, Women love Quality.

Women on the other hand want the top echelon of men, not all men. They only want the prim & proper, the La cream the La cream of men. Jennifer Lopez is an example, she is sexually liberated but her sexual liberation is ONLY for top class men. No female celeb will you find sleeping with random men, they ONLY sleep with top guys. Quality over Quantity!

Men can sleep with any lady, beautiful or not. Famous or not. Even dirty House Helps!

But women will ONLY droll over cute men / TV or Music stars ! They only give their body to the best! Someone like Portable is having women ONLY because he is a famous star, without the star quality, No woman will even touch him with a pole.

Can you see the difference?! or you're still denying reality.

I have given you examples with Facts and reference, I hope you can do the same.

Kelechi009:


I'm sorry but Mr advanceDNA, you're very wrong on this subject.

There are core part of humans that whatever society they are, It will be constant. Hypergamy is one of them, regardless of the society, region and base, women will always want men who have more status, make more money, more wisdom or is powerful. Hence they always flock around those that fit this requirement. According to Nypost, Tiger Woods had 120 affairs, including one with young neighbor. Those women wouldn't even mind being the number 25 or 100 on the roaster, they all want him. Some of those women are regular people, cashiers and restaurant servers etc.

Reference: nypost.com/2010/04/29/tiger-woods-had-120-affairs-including-one-with-young-neighbor/

This has nothing to do with society! Men love Quatity, Women love Quality.

Women on the other hand want the top echelon of men, not all men. They only want the prim & proper, the La cream the La cream of men. Jennifer Lopez is an example, she is sexually liberated but her sexual liberation is ONLY for top class men. No female celeb will you find sleeping with random men, they ONLY sleep with top guys. Quality over Quantity!

Men can sleep with any lady, beautiful or not. Famous or not. Even dirty House Helps!

But women will ONLY droll over cute men / TV or Music stars ! They only give their body to the best! Someone like Portable is having women ONLY because he is a famous star, without the star quality, No woman will even touch him with a pole.

Can you see the difference?! or you're still denying reality.

I have given you examples with Facts and reference, I hope you can do the same.

Men too when choosing choose quality first others are for recreation, same applies to women, some women sleep with men and still pay them money, that is why we have gigolos but when choosing a special one,everybody man or woman will choose the best but the idea of best with everybody does not always begin and end with money. There must be value and that value is not always money. If you say hypergamy is about value I agree with you but it applies to both men and women alike. After choosing people cheat and it applies to both men and women and you are wrong to say only men can sleep with anybody. Almost all men have at one time or the other being seduced by older females, it may be as a boy or as a young man and in most cases, the lady just wants sex.

lawani:



Men too when choosing choose quality first others are for recreation, same applies to women, some women sleep with men and still pay them money, that is why we have gigolos but when choosing a special one,everybody man or woman will choose the best but the idea of best with everybody does not always begin and end with money. There must be value and that value is not always money. If you say hypergamy is about value I agree with you but it applies to both men and women alike. After choosing people cheat and it applies to both men and women and you are wrong to say only men can sleep with anybody. Almost all men have at one time or the other being seduced by older females, it may be as a boy or as a young man and in most cases, the lady just wants sex.

1. The women who sleep with men & pay, aren't they older women who have no options?
2. Have you ever seen a young beautiful woman in her 20s paying a man to sleep with it?
3. Who has paid to sleep with you? How many of them?

If a lady is seducing you, It means you are the best she is attracted to. To HER, you're the best she is seeing. If other men come toasting her, she will not allow them. There is a difference.

The reason why Female prostitution sells & male prostitution does NOT sell is because MEN can sleep with anything! Women don't do that!

Even if a lady just want sex, she will still NOT sleep with you if she does NOT find you WORTHY. You have to be worthy of her body, there is a big value on it. Except she is prostitute or hookup girl.

When a man wants sex, he goes out to pick any nonsense random girl. Women don't do this, except for few exceptions.

Kelechi009:


I'm sorry but Mr advanceDNA, you're very wrong on this subject.

There are core part of humans that whatever society they are, It will be constant. Hypergamy is one of them, regardless of the society, region and base, women will always want men who have more status, make more money, more wisdom or is powerful. Hence they always flock around those that fit this requirement. According to Nypost, Tiger Woods had 120 affairs, including one with young neighbor. Those women wouldn't even mind being the number 25 or 100 on the roaster, they all want him. Some of those women are regular people, cashiers and restaurant servers etc.

Reference: nypost.com/2010/04/29/tiger-woods-had-120-affairs-including-one-with-young-neighbor/

This has nothing to do with society! Men love Quatity, Women love Quality.

Women on the other hand want the top echelon of men, not all men. They only want the prim & proper, the La cream the La cream of men. Jennifer Lopez is an example, she is sexually liberated but her sexual liberation is ONLY for top class men. No female celeb will you find sleeping with random men, they ONLY sleep with top guys. Quality over Quantity!

Men can sleep with any lady, beautiful or not. Famous or not. Even dirty House Helps!

But women will ONLY droll over cute men / TV or Music stars ! They only give their body to the best! Someone like Portable is having women ONLY because he is a famous star, without the star quality, No woman will even touch him with a pole.

Can you see the difference?! or you're still denying reality.

I have given you examples with Facts and reference, I hope you can do the same.

What exactly is wrong??
So women are not biological creatures that want sex..... women dont want variety...
Women are not driven by urge and impules??

Be deceiving urself...the day u find out ur babe fvks 3 dícks at the same time...u will know men and women are not sexually different.... society only curbed their drive and forced certain discipline on them by slut-shaming