Oluwasaeon:
It won't be an interview if the guy should ask how much she needs for her hair.
Anyways, it's none of my business

no mind the foolish girl.

I still don't see what the guy said or did wrong oo.. why not just tell him you're not interested.. immaturity

ledamaster:



In other words go and make money. All those ones reading Iclef abi I clit diy books una hear am? goan make money. Youvare busy reading books to bang ladies, insteadbof startups, lemmi tell you what will happen, sex drive is an energy meant to be used to hustle, now if you bye pass the maon thing and have access to the punas, you wont have anymore reason to hustle hard. This is why a larger percentage of fine boys and players are broke ass, and tge socially u.educated and ugly are richer. go figure.

Don't mind these so called bad boys and false alpha males. How can people center their life and time on how to approach girls; get the attention of girls; control girls and fvck girls of their choice? Girls never show them pepper and Ned Nwoko never snatch their babes. When rich men start snatching their babes over and over and girls start fleeing their broke ass, the scales will fall off their eyes and they will realise that they've been fooling them and wasting their time and life with "badboyrism" and false "alphamalerism." What happened to improving one's knowledge base, skills, finances and habits?

I agree with amakavu.la's approach a bit, just a bit, but I think that when you approach a girl, just be frank — either she is in or out. Don't stoop too low to make your fellow Homo Sapien feel special when in fact, they are no more special than you. Don't be desperate, don't beg her to date you, don't try to go out of your way to please and don't ever let it be that without her, you can't be fine. If she says "no", let her be. Also let your woman know that she is replaceable. In fact, they are all replaceable. Lastly, money above women.

pocohantas:

I suggest a change of circle.

Lol. You don't understand the concept of a rare breed. It means her type is not common...or you're saying reasonable ladies cluster themselves in small groups, so one should start hunting for them so as to escape dealing with senseless girls.....
I'm married by the way, so my wish for there to be more reasonable ladies is not based on a desire to date them, it's based on my desire to live everyday life amongst human beings that have sense. That's not too much to ask, is it? I shouldn't have to dread asking a lady for directions or encounter a female coworker and worry whether her brain is fully developed

pansophist:
The number one cardinal rule in human relationship dynamics is that the Male should not impress the female directly by chatting, spending, wooing etc, but impressing her indirectly with the lifestyle he has built for himself.

From time immemorial, where ladies compete for village warriors, bountiful farmers, royal homes, princes, etc, or in the wildlife where the male gore themselves, birds dance, or the fishes builds a spotless sea bed homes to attract and secure the right to mate with the female, the modern man has gotten it completely wrong in the timeless, ever relevant ritual needed to attract the females without necessarily compromising his self-esteem, and be at the mercy of her consideration.

Movies, pick up artist, and relationship coach scammers have successfully deceived men to believe indulging in words and toasting skills will do the job. Sorry to be the usher of bad news, it doesn't, unless she has already pre-selected and finds you valuable, then it seems like your toasting skills did the job, but in reality, it was a mere confirmation to being chosen in the first place.

Anytime a man approaches a woman, she automatically in high precision, filter out who is the prize. If its you, or her. If it's her (like the topic at hand implies), you will be the object of her scorn, the interaction will be devoid of interest, honour, and you'll find yourself always pushing to squeeze out words from her which if she did, will be one words constructed with shorthand. You'll feel the pressure the keep up the conversations, and find yourself compromising to retain her interest.

Now let's flip the table round. If she realized the man is the prize, even if you write just a word, it is enough for her to reply you with a letter, retain your attention, and the conversation going smoothly. Now let's swap the guy with Davido. Do you honestly think that a guy in the caliber of Davido will be treated like she did to the guy? She even went ahead to share the conversations, to reassure herself and her followers that she is the prize, and she have endless stream of thirsty male orbiting around her, its female narcissism at its finest.

The moral of the whole write up is that men should work on themself wholly (financially, physically, intellectually, professionally etc), then you will grow higher in the sexual marketplace rank, and you will enjoy an endless stream of women who shall find you attractive, and you'll take your pick from there. Channel your energy rightly, not to woo her, but to build a admirable life for yourself, so that women who are on the lookout for viable males will find you a catch.

Pansophist

I had to login to commend your mind.

Brilliant!

pansophist:


Actually they dont mind be woed, they just don't want it from the guys they perceive as low value (even if he is not low value). Before they decide to respond to a guys message, they will browse his profile looking for cues that signifies his status. They will go far back to when he started posting, to determine if he is faking it, or class is woven in the fabric of his being. They will browse the profile of people tagged in his post, and determine their worth as well.

Men generally underestimate the extent and scope of female hypergamy. It is the single most important force that determines if a guy deserves her attention. For a woman to date a guy she considers as low status is a proof that she is not the prize, and she generally wont even respond, unless she has lost out in beauty, fertility and age, then is is when they generally lower their standards.

Women are always in constant battle amongst themselves. From the way they dress to impress other women, exotic place they've been to post on social media, or the kind of guy they associate with, all the external factors plays an important role on which men she will hang out with. She believes she is the prize, and that alone influences everything in her life, including men she will date.

Second!

pansophist:
The number one cardinal rule in human relationship dynamics is that the male should not impress the female directly by chatting, spending, wooing etc, but impressing her indirectly with the lifestyle he has built for himself.

From time immemorial, where ladies compete for the commitment of village warriors, bountiful farmers, royal homes, princes, etc, or in the wildlife where the bulls gore themselves, birds dance, or the fishes build a spotless sea bed homes to attract and secure the right to mate with the female, the modern man has gotten it completely wrong in the timeless, ever-relevant ritual needed to attract the females without necessarily compromising his self-esteem, and be at the mercy of her consideration.

Movies, pick up artist, and relationship coach scammers have successfully deceived men to believe indulging in words and toasting skills will do the job. Sorry to be the usher of bad news, it doesn't, unless she has already pre-selected and finds you valuable, then it seems like your toasting skills did the job, but in reality, it was a mere confirmation to being chosen in the first place.

Anytime a man approaches a woman, she automatically in high precision, filter out who is the prize. If its you, or her. If it's her (like the topic at hand implies), you will be the object of her scorn, the interaction will be devoid of interest, honour, and you'll find yourself always pushing to squeeze out words from her which if she did, will be one words constructed with shorthand. You'll feel the pressure the keep up the conversations, and find yourself compromising to retain her interest.

Now let's flip the table round. If she realized the man is the prize, even if you write just a word, it is enough for her to reply you with a letter, retain your attention, and the conversation going smoothly. Now let's swap the guy with Davido. Do you honestly think that a guy in the caliber of Davido will be treated like she did to the guy? She even went ahead to share the conversations, to reassure herself and her followers that she is the prize, and she have endless stream of thirsty male orbiting around her, its female narcissism at its finest.

The moral of the whole write up is that men should work on themself wholly (financially, physically, intellectually, professionally etc), then you will grow higher in the sexual marketplace rank, and you will enjoy an endless stream of women who shall find you attractive, and you'll take your pick from there. Channel your energy rightly, not to woo her, but to build a admirable life for yourself, so that women who are on the lookout for viable males will find you a catch.

Pansophist

Third!

pansophist:
The number one cardinal rule in human relationship dynamics is that the male should not impress the female directly by chatting, spending, wooing etc, but impressing her indirectly with the lifestyle he has built for himself.

From time immemorial, where ladies compete for the commitment of village warriors, bountiful farmers, royal homes, princes, etc, or in the wildlife where the bulls gore themselves, birds dance, or the fishes build a spotless sea bed homes to attract and secure the right to mate with the female, the modern man has gotten it completely wrong in the timeless, ever-relevant ritual needed to attract the females without necessarily compromising his self-esteem, and be at the mercy of her consideration.

Movies, pick up artist, and relationship coach scammers have successfully deceived men to believe indulging in words and toasting skills will do the job. Sorry to be the usher of bad news, it doesn't, unless she has already pre-selected and finds you valuable, then it seems like your toasting skills did the job, but in reality, it was a mere confirmation to being chosen in the first place.

Anytime a man approaches a woman, she automatically in high precision, filter out who is the prize. If its you, or her. If it's her (like the topic at hand implies), you will be the object of her scorn, the interaction will be devoid of interest, honour, and you'll find yourself always pushing to squeeze out words from her which if she did, will be one words constructed with shorthand. You'll feel the pressure the keep up the conversations, and find yourself compromising to retain her interest.

Now let's flip the table round. If she realized the man is the prize, even if you write just a word, it is enough for her to reply you with a letter, retain your attention, and the conversation going smoothly. Now let's swap the guy with Davido. Do you honestly think that a guy in the caliber of Davido will be treated like she did to the guy? She even went ahead to share the conversations, to reassure herself and her followers that she is the prize, and she have endless stream of thirsty male orbiting around her, its female narcissism at its finest.

The moral of the whole write up is that men should work on themself wholly (financially, physically, intellectually, professionally etc), then you will grow higher in the sexual marketplace rank, and you will enjoy an endless stream of women who shall find you attractive, and you'll take your pick from there. Channel your energy rightly, not to woo her, but to build a admirable life for yourself, so that women who are on the lookout for viable males will find you a catch.

Pansophist

May too much sense not kill you. You're too much! I've always known the concept of hypergamy for years now but your posts have further refined my understanding. Which is why I am not surprised or fazed by behaviours females exhibit today.

Well done!

Gerrard59:


May too much sense not kill you. You're too much! I've always known the concept of hypergamy for years now but your posts have further refined my understanding. Which is why I am not surprised or fazed by behaviours females exhibit today.

Well done!

It resonates with you because instinctively, you subconsciously understood it, but probably can't connect the dots neatly. A woman is hypergamous as water is wet, it is not a question of "if she is", but a question of "to what degree".

To make it clear, hypergamy is not a bad thing, I'll compare it with the way employers trash out the bad applicants for the good one. Hypergamy is one of the reason why men go ahead and build civilisations, since women will only go after top men and men need to keep improving to impress. The problem with modern hypergamy is that it is practiced without restraint, its basically on steroid.

Unrestrained hypergamy was chained in the past in a sense that a young woman is paired with a man during her beautiful years, while he provides for her even after the peak of her attractiveness. So basically you stay with me when you're hot, and ill still be provide with you when you're old. Right now we know its not like this. It has to do with something known as "the deregulation of the sexual marketplace".

It is the basis of all the problems we have in society today. If children are cultured by parents, employees oversee by employers, police protect citizens and government enforce law, why not our sexuality? Before, society was structured in a way that chains the dark sides of human sexuality. The dark side of male sexuality is disdain for commitment and responsibility, with harems of women and for women, it is hypergamy, but right now things have changed, even a kid of sixteen is whoring on Instagram and men do not want to commit but keep sleeping around. That's the deregulation. I'll write indepth about this one day.

Bloooody:

OR
Ask for her account number and watch as her laps open like freshly made eba

pansophist:


It resonates with you because instinctively, you subconsciously understood it, but probably can't connect the dots neatly. A woman is hypergamous as water is wet, it is not a question of "if she is", but a question of "to what degree".

To make it clear, hypergamy is not a bad thing, I'll compare it with the way employers trash out the bad applicants for the good one. Hypergamy is one of the reason why men go ahead and build civilisations, since women will only go after top men and men need to keep improving to impress. The problem with modern hypergamy is that it is practiced without restraint, its basically on steroid.

Unrestrained hypergamy was chained in the past in a sense that a young woman is paired with a man during her beautiful years, while he provides for her even after the peak of her attractiveness. So basically you stay with me when you're hot, and ill still be provide with you when you're old. Right now we know its not like this. It has to do with something known as "the deregulation of the sexual marketplace".

It is the basis of all the problems we have in society today. If children are cultured by parents, employees oversee by employers, police protect citizens and government enforce law, why not our sexuality? Before, society was structured in a way that chains the dark sides of human sexuality. The dark side of male sexuality is disdain for commitment and responsibility, with harems of women and for women, it is hypergamy, but right now things have changed, even a kid of sixteen is whoring on Instagram and men do not want to commit but keep sleeping around. That's the deregulation. I'll write indepth about this one day.

please do. You are one of the reasons i come online

All I could say is that pansophist is a brilliant lad. His analysis says it all! Bravo bravo

pocohantas:

Chick is actually an ODE, the guy is right on that one. Bye

wait o are my eyes deceiving me poco is actually on our side on this one. We need this poco in 2020 o

Deicide:
wait o are my eyes deceiving me poco is actually on our side on this one. We need this poco in 2020 o

I am actually more sensible, unbiased and objective than 98% of you. This is not even me being insulting. Don’t need a version of me in your 2020. I will type my truth when the need arises, if it doesn’t please you- keep waiting for the one that would please you.

All this small small girls with panla brain.......wey go wake up for morning chop cold okro and eba
Dey form boss for twitter thunder fire your third leg der.