geoworldedu:
Pls I really need an answer to this. It bothers me day and night. Does God also wee wee with his peniis or he only used it to straff vrigin Mary to give birth to baby Jesus? Pls I need answers.

geoworldedu:
Mutteylaff avoiding my threads like plague

DominusPrime:
This is why I love christianity. Can you ask this of a muslim concerning Mohammed?

GodSaklek:



Definitely u are waiting for Muslim to come and strike first, honestly Christians killed more people than Muslim,... Lol.. we learnt that Jesus is a gay while Mohammed is a pedophile,but we've forgave him because he repents and felt remorse for his several millennium crimes on eath in the past,apart from that,he has got a deserve punishment for his crime on earth, he was killed on several occasions and was casted into a lake of fire to suffer. ..


Stephenmoka4
Usorohtheman
Faithful4real
princevinco
HeavenlyHolines
Askme2020
ThinkFreely
Chosen1984

Usorohtheman:


Who was cast to a lake of fire?

Stephenmoka4:
It's a miraculous conception, the child was placed by God, two human can give birth to God (Jesus), spirit don't pee, urinating is a physical attribute of many earthly creatures.

Usorohtheman:


Who was cast to a lake of fire?

MuttleyLaff:
I dont the real Stephen Moka would agree with you on that.

How can two hunans possibly give birth to God? (i.e. Jesus) Please explain. Thank you.

MuttleyLaff:
You are right about God is not human. Absolutely, God is not human, from the factual basis that God is incorporeal. Now having said that, the context where the Bible states that "... God is not human ..." is said on the understanding that, God is like human beings who would be unjust and deceitful over a matter. That exactly is how what the construct of that phrase means and how it is about.

On to the second part of your comment, I am sorry to burst your pretty bubble with telling that, God, by virtue of His partly revealed "I AM that I AM" name, will by that telepraphy name, will be whatever He necessarily needs to be. So God, because of necessity, when He became human on earth, did engage in all human activities bar commit a sin while at it. Praise God. Alleluia.

aadoiza, if not for the sake of the respect I have for you, I normally overlook geoworldedu's ignorant threads or posts.

God, with the first commandment, this in a paraphrased said manner, states, not to have any other god and/or gods before or after Him and not make a graven image of Him.

The thing aadozia, is that the Christian god is a human invention, it's a Constantine contraption, an invented up god, hotchpotched with varied Roman paganisms, lol.

You are dragging me aadozia into chalk and cheese, into apples and oranges, into two different and two unlike things, lol.

PS: God never straffed Mary. Why would He? Why should He? Why must He?

Stephenmoka4:
It's a miraculous conception, the child was placed by God, two humans can't give birth to God (Jesus), spirit don't pee, urinating is a physical attribute of many earthly creatures.

geoworldedu:
You can't counter my post because the intelligence is higher than what you could ever imagine. To you, you think God is someone far away in the sky that we can't even touch his penis? No, no, no bros. God is like our friend, we can pull at his dicck in prayers

geoworldedu:

My hope is built on nothing else than Jesus dicck and righteous mess.
I cannot suck his dicck alone but call on all my friends and foe.

On Christ God's solid dicck I stand, all other diccks are stinking bad, all other diccks are stinking bad (Song by Yahwehpenis)

Ek3mini:
God created man in his own image, so why can't God pee like man?

geoworldedu:
You can't counter my post because the intelligence is higher than what you could ever imagine. To you, you think God is someone far away in the sky that we can't even touch his penis? No, no, no bros. God is like our friend, we can pull at his dicck in prayers

Ek3mini:
God created man in his own image, so why can't God pee like man?

princevinco:


Jobless fellow or a guy still in secondary school who lack the acumen as to reason well. It is your frustration that is pushing you to make these nonsense posts. Sorry, I can't be found arguing with you over a nonsense post.

Stephenmoka4:
The word *Image* here means certain attribute here, i.e You have the image of your dad or Madison has the image of her mom. etc shows characteristics or features that looks like or comparable. Do God breath, do God sneeze/cough/get goosebumps when there is an allergy, Do God use the restroom. Those are a common earthly features that are made for survival.

geoworldedu:
But God and his angels can eat the fruit of life abi?

Stephenmoka4:
Is fruit of life a tangible entity

geoworldedu:

Yes, it was planted in the Garden of Eden, Adam was charged to take care of it but not to eat from it.

geoworldedu:

Hahaha, the intelligence of the thread is higher than you and now you are running away

Stephenmoka4:
I might be wrong but, pass me the Bible verse of God/Angels eating the fruit of life, I want to verify the entire chapter not just a line.

geoworldedu:
Don't change ground. You said the tree of life is not tangible but I said it was planted in the garden of Eden. Now I will send you different references about the tree of life then you can make interpretation for yourself if it is tangible or not.


Genesis 2:8-9

The Lord God planted a garden toward the east, in Eden; and there He placed the man whom He had formed. Out of the ground the Lord God caused to grow every tree that is pleasing to the sight and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
Genesis 3:22-24

Then the Lord God said, “Behold, the man has become like one of Us, knowing good and evil; and now, he might stretch out his hand, and take also from the tree of life, and eat, and live forever”— therefore the Lord God sent him out from the garden of Eden, to cultivate the ground from which he was taken. So He drove the man out; and at the east of the garden of Eden He stationed the cherubim and the flaming sword which turned every direction to guard the way to the tree of life.
Revelation 22:1-2

Then he showed me a river of the water of life, clear as crystal, coming from the throne of God and of the Lamb, in the middle of its street. On either side of the river was the tree of life, bearing twelve kinds of fruit, yielding its fruit every month; and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations.
Revelation 2:7
Verse Concepts

He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. To him who overcomes, I will grant to eat of the tree of life which is in the Paradise of God.’

Stephenmoka4:
Check properly, I asked if it's tangible

geoworldedu:
And what have you finally come out with? Is it tangible or not?

geoworldedu:
But God and his angels can eat the fruit of life abi?

Stephenmoka4:
Is fruit of life a tangible entity

geoworldedu:
Yes, it was planted in the Garden of Eden, Adam was charged to take care of it but not to eat from it.

Stephenmoka4:
I might be wrong but, pass me the Bible verse of God/Angels eating the fruit of life, I want to verify the entire chapter not just a line.

geoworldedu:
Don't change ground. You said the tree of life is not tangible but I said it was planted in the garden of Eden. Now I will send you different references about the tree of life then you can make interpretation for yourself if it is tangible or not....

Stephenmoka4:
Check properly, I asked if it's tangible

geoworldedu:
And what have you finally come out with?
Is it tangible or not?

Stephenmoka4:
I can't say it's tangible.

MuttleyLaff:


...see sermons, yet you brought all these out from your own head, not from the bible











It is obviously tangible, however, it's not of any use for the extra-terrestrial beings nor for what makes up the council in the Godhood.

The TKGE's sole purpose is to be a tool in a test lab environment, while the Tree of life, however is an elixir of life for terestrial beings aka human beings and not for extra-terrestrial beings aka angelic hosts of heaven (e.g. cherubims, seraphims and/or whatnot)

The Tree of Life, is seen in Apostle John's vision, the disciple whom Jesus love, at Revelation 22:2, as being present, but the TGKE is noticeably absent and not anymore have a mention. It has served it's purpose and is no longer necessary, hence the reason for its unmistakeable forever abstenteeism.

God and His angels have no cause nor need to eat the fruit of the Tree of Life. This is something for humans, and its particularly for their well being and general wellness.

Access to eating, off the Tree of Life, perpetuates the state or one's nature, so this is why, it is inadvisable to have access to the Tree of Life, if one already, is a human and particularly, a human being, in a fall from grace state and of course, with sin.

geoworldedu:
...see sermons,
yet you brought all these out from your own head, not from the bible

MuttleyLaff:














It is obviously tangible, however, it's not of any use for the extra-terrestrial beings nor for what makes up the council in the Godhood.

The TKGE's sole purpose is to be a tool in a test lab environment, while the Tree of life, however is an elixir of life for terestrial beings aka human beings and not for extra-terrestrial beings aka angelic hosts of heaven (e.g. cherubims, seraphims and/or whatnot)

The Tree of Life, is seen in Apostle John's vision, the disciple whom Jesus love, at Revelation 22:2, as being present, but the TGKE is noticeably absent and not anymore have a mention. It has served it's purpose and is no longer necessary, hence the reason for its unmistakeable forever abstenteeism.

God and His angels have no cause nor need to eat the fruit of the Tree of Life. This is something for humans, and its particularly for their well being and general wellness.

Access to eating, off the Tree of Life, perpetuates the state or one's nature, so this is why, it is inadvisable to have access to the Tree of Life, if one already, is a human and particularly, a human being, in a fall from grace state and of course, with sin.

Stephenmoka4:
I didn't agree or disagree with that guy.

MuttleyLaff:
I know you didn't agree or disagree with that guy. I loved how you cautiously rolled with him though, even when you obviously knew he was trying to use the entrapment technique on you, lol